Logo
Home » Previous Page » Article: Americans Subsidize Shipping from China to US

Americans Subsidize Shipping from China to US

Each year the cost to ship packages increases and the post office continues to lose money. Maybe they need to rethink the subsidies that they are giving China to ship to the USA. Why should we pay more to ship overseas when other countries don't?

Negotiated Service Agreements With China are Causing the Post Office to Lose Money

Posted By Dee Jones | February 13, 2018 | BuyDirectUSA.com

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on twitter Follow us on Pinterest Follow us on instagram

Did you know that it is cheaper to ship a one pound product from China to the United States than it is to ship the same product from the United States to China? Although it may be hard to believe it's true and part of the reason the post office is losing money. Thanks to the Universal Postal Union treaty run by the UN the United States Postal Service (USPS) actually loses money on all packages shipped from China to the USA (this service is called ePacket). Thus all those companies shipping on Amazon or EBay from China to the USA are benefiting from these ridiculously low shipping costs. All the while small to medium sized companies based in the USA have to pay higher shipping costs year after year.

"According to the terms set out in Universal Postal Union treaty, the USPS in 2014 gets paid no more than about $1.50 for delivering a one-pound package from a foreign carrier."

In 2016 the USPS stopped offering discounts when businesses used their Click N' Ship service to enter packages for shipping and the cost to ship priority mail packages increased an average of 9.4%. In 2017 the cost increased 9.8% and in 2018 it increased another 6.2%. These increases are not applied to ALL businesses that ship with USPS. As companies like Amazon negotiate shipping rates with USPS that are far lower than what small to mid level business owners pay to ship with the post office. "Amazon has a sweetheart deal with the Postal Service. It’s called a Negotiated Service Agreement, and its purpose is to make it worth Amazon’s while to ship through the Postal Service rather than competitors such as UPS or Fed-Ex."

Ironically since many of the sellers on Amazon's platform are from China it makes it difficult for US sellers to compete price wise with these sellers when you factor in the cost to ship an order.

The United States Post Office has been steadily raising their rates on stamps, priority and express mail packages for quite some time now. Yet each price increase has done nothing to stop the post office from losing money. "The Postal Service reported a net loss for the year of $2.7 billion, a decrease in net loss of $2.8 billion compared to 2016."

While many would like to debunk Trump's tweet about the post office not charging Amazon enough. He is not wrong. The post office loses $1.46 on every package that it delivers for Amazon. But there is more to the post office's losses than what it charges Amazon and that is what the post office charges China and other countries to ship to the USA. Most don't realize that China is paying even less to ship to the USA and the post office is losing a lot more money when consumers order on Amazon or EBay and that item is shipped from China to the United States.

If Trump wants to stop the bloodletting by the post office then he needs to look into removing the ePacket and low to no cost shipping agreements they have with China and other foreign countries. This may go a long way to not only help the post office become finaicially sound but at the same time help American owned businesses compete with cheap goods being sent to consumers direct from China.

More Articles on this topic:

 


Company: BuyDirectUSA.com
Tags:   Press Releases    USPS    China    Negotiated Service Treaty    Amazon    EBay    United States Post Office
Print Print this article
Rating: 5.00 (1 votes) Rate this article
Bookmark and share this article:  
Comodo SSL